Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Silent Man

Is there a purpose to a message if it never has a receiver?

3 comments:

The Crow said...

It lets you know that you know it.
If you do not know it, it lets you know that you have a question.
If you have a question, it shows you that you do not yet trust yourself to answer it.
If none of the above applies, it lets you know that the message itself may have been poorly crafted.

Things I have launched out into the cyberspaces, sometimes come back, years into the future, in an email from someone who needed to read what I had written.

You never know :)

Fay Campbell said...

I don't believe a message without a receiver is possible any more than a message without a sender. It may not be the receiver - or even the message - the sender intends, but we can't not communicate. Good thinker!

Anonymous said...

Did you forget who is the receiver?.

Tao of course.

And who is the sender, is it "you" or Tao?.

Then the purpose it's done.